Laplace Transforms (Part 3. Laplace Transforms)
Posted by Unknown on 8:14 PM with No comments
Laplace Transforms
As we saw in the last section
computing Laplace transforms directly can be
fairly complicated. Usually we just use
a table of transforms when actually computing Laplace transforms.
The table that is provided here is not an inclusive table, but does
include most of the commonly used Laplace transforms and most of the commonly
needed formulas pertaining to Laplace
transforms.
Before doing a couple of examples to illustrate the use of
the table let’s get a quick fact out of the way.
Fact
Given f(t) and g(t) then,
for any constants a
and b.
|
In other words, we don’t worry about constants and we don’t
worry about sums or differences of functions in taking Laplace
transforms. All that we need to do is
take the transform of the individual functions, then put any constants back in
and add or subtract the results back up.
So, let’s do a couple of quick examples.
Example 1 Find
the Laplace transforms of the given
functions.
Solution
Okay, there’s not really a whole lot to do here other than
go to the table, transform the individual
functions up, put any constants back in and then add or subtract the results.
We’ll do these examples in a little more detail than is
typically used since this is the first time we’re using the tables.
|
Make sure that you pay attention to the difference between a
“normal” trig function and hyperbolic functions. The only difference between them is the “+ a2” for the “normal” trig
functions becomes a “- a2”
in the hyperbolic function! It’s very
easy to get in a hurry and not pay attention and grab the wrong formula. If you don’t recall the definition of the
hyperbolic functions see the notes for the table.
Let’s do one final set of examples.
Example 2 Find
the transform of each of the following functions.
Solution
This function is not in the table of Laplace
transforms. However we can use #30 in the table to compute its
transform. This will correspond to #30
if we take n=1.
So, we then have,
Using #30 we then have,
This part will also use #30
in the table. In fact we could use #30
in one of two ways. We could use it
with
Or we could use it with
Since it’s less work to do one derivative, let’s do it the
first way. So using #9 we have,
The transform is then,
This part can be done using either #6 (with
Now, using #5,
we get the following.
This is what we would have gotten had we used #6.
For this part we will use #24 along with the answer from the
previous part. To see this note that
if
then
Therefore, the transform is.
Remember that g(0)
is just a constant so when we differentiate it we will get zero!
|
As this set of examples has shown us we can’t forget to use
some of the general formulas in the table to
derive new Laplace transforms for functions that aren’t explicitly listed in
the table!
0 comments:
Post a Comment