Second Order Differential Equations (Part 4. Repeated Roots)
Posted by Unknown on 7:58 PM with No comments
Repeated Roots
In this section we will be looking at the last case for the
constant coefficient, linear, homogeneous second order differential
equations. In this case we want
solutions to
|
|
where solutions to the characteristic equation
|
|
are double roots r1
= r2 = r.
This leads to a problem however. Recall that the solutions are
|
|
These are the same solution and will NOT be “nice enough” to
form a general solution. I do promise
that I’ll define “nice enough” eventually! So, we can use the first solution, but we’re
going to need a second solution.
Before finding this second solution let’s take a little side
trip. The reason for the side trip will
be clear eventually. From the quadratic
formula we know that the roots to the characteristic equation are,
|
|
|
In this case, since we have double roots we must have
|
|
This is the only way that we can get double roots and in
this case the roots will be
|
|
So, the one solution that we’ve got is
To find a second solution we will use the fact that a
constant times a solution to a linear homogeneous differential equation is also
a solution. If this is true then maybe
we’ll get lucky and the following will also be a solution
|
with a proper choice of v(t). To determine if this in fact can be done,
let’s plug this back into the differential equation and see what we get. We’ll first need a couple of derivatives.
|
|
We dropped the (t)
part on the v to simplify things a
little for the writing out of the derivatives.
Now, plug these into the differential equation.
|
|
We can factor an exponential out of all the terms so let’s
do that. We’ll also collect all the
coefficients of v and its
derivatives.
|
|
Now, because we are working with a double root we know that
that the second term will be zero. Also
exponentials are never zero. Therefore, (1)
will be a solution to the differential equation provided v(t) is a function that satisfies the following differential
equation.
|
|
|
We can drop the a
because we know that it can’t be zero.
If it were we wouldn’t have a second order differential equation! So, we can now determine the most general
possible form that is allowable for v(t).
|
|
This is actually more complicated than we need and in fact
we can drop both of the constants from this.
To see why this is let’s go ahead and use this to get the second
solution. The two solutions are then
|
|
Eventually you
will be able to show that these two solutions are “nice enough” to form a
general solution. The general solution
would then be the following.
|
|
|
Notice that we rearranged things a little. Now, c,
k, c1, and c2
are all unknown constants so any combination of them will also be unknown
constants. In particular, c1+c2 k and c2
c are unknown constants so we’ll just rewrite them as follows.
|
|
So, if we go back to the most general form for v(t) we can take c=1 and k=0 and we will
arrive at the same general solution.
Let’s recap. If the
roots of the characteristic equation are r1
= r2 = r, then the general solution is then
|
|
Now, let’s work a couple of examples.
Example 1 Solve
the following IVP.
Solution
The characteristic equation and its roots are.
The general solution and its derivative are
Don’t forget to product rule the second term! Plugging in the initial conditions gives
the following system.
This system is easily solve to get c1 = 12 and c2
= -27. The actual solution to the IVP
is then.
|
Example 2 Solve
the following IVP.
Solution
The characteristic equation and its roots are.
The general solution and its derivative are
Don’t forget to product rule the second term! Plugging in the initial conditions gives
the following system.
This system is easily solve to get c1 = 3 and c2
= -6. The actual solution to the IVP
is then.
|
Example 3 Solve
the following IVP
Solution
The characteristic equation and its roots are.
The general solution and its derivative are
Plugging in the initial conditions gives the following
system of equations.
Solving this system gives the following constants.
The actual solution to the IVP is then.
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment